Pros, cons of Prop. 55: School buildings | TheUnion.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Pros, cons of Prop. 55: School buildings

Prepared by the League of Women Voters of California

This is the first of four pro-con looks at statewide propositions on the March 2 California election ballot, prepared by the League of Women Voters of California. Voters are urged to save each of them for Election Day. (A Spanish-language version can be found online at http://www.ca.lwv.org.)

Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004



The question




Should the state sell $12.3 billion in general obligation bonds for construction and renovation of K-12 school facilities and higher education facilities?

The situation

In November 2002, the voters approved Proposition 47, the first $13 billion of a $25 billion bond package for K-12 and higher education facilities construction and repair. The size of the package was based on the backlog of unfunded projects and projections of over one million additional K-12 students and about 700,000 college students entering the system in the next decade.

The proposal

Proposition 55 allows the state to issue $12.3 billion of general obligation bonds for construction and renovation of K-12 school facilities and higher education facilities.

– $10.0 billion for K-12 facilities:

– $5.26 billion for new construction with local districts paying 50 percent of costs. (Up to $300 million of this amount would be available for charter school facilities.)

– $2.25 billion for rehabilitation of older schools with local districts paying 40 percent of costs

– $2.44 billion for districts with critically overcrowded schools

-$50 million for joint-use projects such as facilities used by both a K-12 school district and a local library district

– $2.3 billion for public higher education facilities – construction of new buildings and related infrastructure, alteration of existing buildings, and purchase of equipment for use in these buildings:

– $920 million for community colleges

– $690 million for the California State University

– $690 million for the University of California.

The governor and legislature would select the specific projects to be funded.

Fiscal effect

Costs are estimated to be $24.7 billion over 30 years, with average payment for principal and interest being $823 million a year.

What a yes or no vote means

A YES vote means that $12.3 billion in general obligation bonds could be sold for construction and renovation of K-12 school facilities and higher education facilities.

A NO vote means that $12.3 billion in general obligation bonds could not be sold for these purposes.

Supporters say . . .

– 73 percent of California classrooms are over 25 years old and our classrooms are the third most crowded in the nation.

– Proposition 55 is an investment in the future of our economy, and it will produce local jobs.

– The measure contains strict accountability standards to assure that the funds are not wasted.

– The state treasurer says that Proposition 55 is a sound investment.

Opponents say . . .

– California has tens of billions of dollars in outstanding bonds and has the worst credit rating in the nation. This is no time to take on more debt.

– We could build and repair schools without borrowing the funds if the issue was given a higher priority in the state budget.

– Half of all school districts received nothing from the 2002 bond measure. Many districts cannot meet the 40 percent local matching fund requirement.

– 25 percent of the funds would go to Los Angeles, which has only 12 percent of the students.

For more information:

Supporters: Californians for Accountability and Better Schools, 888-563-0055, http://www.Yeson55.com

Opponents: California Taxpayer Protection Committee, 916-991-9300, http://www.ProtectTaxpayers.com.


Support Local Journalism


Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.

 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


Opinion

Mark Johnson: One question …

|

Every single person I know … every acquaintance that I have spoken with recently … is 100% against reopening the Idaho-Maryland Mine. The destruction of our valued way of life looks like it would be…



See more