Private animosity not a public issue |

Private animosity not a public issue

The Union was correct in informing the voting public of the disruption of the Republican Central Committee meeting by two parties.

May I suggest that when the confrontation continued outside because of a personal feud, the comments made in anger by both parties were of a personal nature and need not have been reported.

This is a small-town newspaper in a close community, and such disparaging remarks made out of private animosity need not be aired in this public forum.

Marianne Cole

Grass Valley

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


Mark Johnson: One question …


Every single person I know … every acquaintance that I have spoken with recently … is 100% against reopening the Idaho-Maryland Mine. The destruction of our valued way of life looks like it would be…

See more