No blank check | TheUnion.com
YOUR AD HERE »

No blank check

In 1996, the homeowners in the Consolidated Fire Protection District voted to pay $30 a year for 10 years. Now the district wants the owners to vote to pay $89 a year. No sunset date, with the potential of a annual 3 percent increase by the vote of the fire board members.

The current assessment generates $345,000 a year. The new assessment will generate $1.3 million a year – three times the current fee and that would increase their budget by 33 percent.

The district did a nice job of pointing out their increasing cost of operations. They did not mention a rise in the county assessment value, which would increase their budget. For every building permit the fire department receives a fee, and when the building is completed, an increase in fire assessment fees.



I may agree that some assessment may be needed. I will never vote for a assessment without a sunset clause, or one with no control by the voters for an increase. The district is asking us to give them a blank check! No amount, no date, just our signature.

Vernon Whitney




Grass Valley


Support Local Journalism


Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.

 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


Opinion

Alvin Blake: Strengthen our power grid

|

We must do more to strengthen our power grid against an electromagnetic pulse event. Such an event can result from an attack by terrorists or by another country (China may already have the capability) or…



See more