NID and solar |

NID and solar

This letter is in reference to a small paragraph, which appears on page 4 of the recent “NID Waterways” blurb that the customers receive with their bills titled “NID Goes Solar.” It states that they are spending $600,000 to put in a solar system at one of their facilities to provide 15 percent of this station’s total energy needs.

Since the district is raising water rates and on Page 1 of the referenced blurb the district states they are losing $6 million in state money, can they possibly justify this money losing-expenditure?

Space doesn’t permit a dissertation on the economics of solar power but please consider the following:

1. NID generates its own hydroelectric, so their cost for their own electric is miniscule compared to a homeowner’s electric rate.

2. The article states that half the money ($300,000) will be provided by a “grant” from PG&E. C’mon folks, who gives PG&E their money? We people who have homes with gas and electric provided by them and pay their bills. (Most if not all NID customers, I suspect). Is it time for another course on “Free Money 101”?

Hopefully, the district will be able to produce a realistic economic analysis of this venture.

Thomas Steinert


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


See more