Nagging question |

Nagging question

The recent passing of former President Reagan has thrust the issue of stem cell research back into the headlines. Nancy Reagan has publicly requested that the Bush administration reconsider its position limiting the creation of new lines of stem cells.

All of the political and ethical positioning leaves me with one nagging question. On one hand, George Bush is opposed to the creation of new stem cells because they would require destroying embryos, yet on the other hand he is willing to send young soldiers to die in Iraq. Why is it wrong to destroy life in hopes of saving millions suffering from Alzheimer’s, Parkinsons and diabetes, but it is good to destroy life to promote a political ideology in other parts of the world?

Mark Schaefer

Penn Valley

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User