Must we revert to the ‘eye for an eye’ thinking? | TheUnion.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Must we revert to the ‘eye for an eye’ thinking?

Must we revert to the ‘eye for an eye’ thinking?

As a 70-year-old great-grandmother, I have experienced enough evidence of what war in all its death and misery can leave behind.

Haven’t we, as human beings, found a way to solve our differences without reverting back to that old “eye for an eye” barbaric behavior? Our country is the richest and strongest in the world, but with those attributes in a civilized democracy comes responsibility and compassion, not just another shootout. Where are our light emissaries?



Where are our wisdom speakers? Is this all about re-election or revenge as a concession to the greedy oil mongers? Longfellow said it best: “If we could read the secret history of our enemies, we should find in each person’s life sorrow and suffering enough to disarm all hostility.”

Midge Pettler




Nevada City


Support Local Journalism


Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.

 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User