Voter IDs still a problem |

Voter IDs still a problem

This letter is written in response to an op-ed piece written by Linda Erdmann (The Union, Aug. 21) in response to another op-ed piece by Nancy Eubanks.

Ms. Erdmann implies Ms. Eubanks is “naïve” in her stating that voter fraud, e.g., impersonating another voter, voting twice, is “essentially nonexistent.”

The data noted by Ms. Erdmann, e.g., duplicate voter registrations, dead persons on the registrations rolls, appears to come from Pew Charitable Trusts, which did a study of voter databases across the country. Pew indeed found considerable discrepancies in these databases. But where are voter fraud and the need for voter IDs in this data?

More relevant data comes from News 21, a group out of the Cronkite School of Journalism at Arizona State University. In January 2012, this group began an exhaustive seven-month study of the issue called “Who Can Vote?” and used students from the universities of Florida, Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska and North Carolina and Arizona State. The students looked at elections in every state election from 2000 through 2010 and found exactly 632 incidents of a voter impersonating another. That is 632 voter fraud incidents out 621,000,000 voters! “Infinitesimal” (News 21), or “essentially non existent” (Eubanks).

Ellen Macdonald

Grass Valley

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User