George Rebane: Zink muddles the issue | TheUnion.com
YOUR AD HERE »

George Rebane: Zink muddles the issue

Mr. Phil Zink’s recent Other Voices column continues the argument that people other than Ms. Reinette Senum’s constituents have a right, beyond exercising their voices and wallets, to determine her political future.

Ignoring her received support, he seems to miss that Ms. Senum may well and most likely does represent the attitudes of some Nevada City residents, especially those who voted for her. In formulating our counsel concerning Ms. Senum, we should understand that:

· The legal expressability of an unpopular sentiment

· Public expression of the unpopular sentiment by an elected official

· The sharing of the sentiment by the official’s constituency

· The right of constituents holding unpopular sentiments to be represented

· The legal aspects of an official’s tenure in office – who/what is required to unseat, are independent factors that bear on the matter.

To muddle these factors only confounds the public debate, and highlights our Founders’ long-standing concern about America’s “Great Experiment” to demonstrate that people are capable of governing themselves. I have gone into some detail about this issue on Rebane’s Ruminations.

George Rebane

Nevada City


Support Local Journalism


Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.

For tax deductible donations, click here.
 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User