Horne misinformed | TheUnion.com

Horne misinformed

In Supervisor Sue Horne’s interview in The Union (Feb. 13), she cites the 2001 Gap Fire on the Tahoe National Forest as an example of why we need more logging to supposedly reduce fire risk, and she claims that dead trees could not be removed after the fire because of litigation. Ms. Horne is badly misinformed.

First of all, the area burned most severely was a 220-acre stand commercially “thinned” several years ago in precisely the manner now proposed under the Bush Administration’s new plan for the Sierra Nevada. Trees 30 inches in diameter were removed and canopy cover was degraded. Most of the surrounding old-growth forest that was not logged burned mildly or moderately.

Second, there was no litigation filed on the Gap fire project, and the dead trees have been removed, though the Forest Service took only the largest trees and left behind the flammable slash debris.

Chad Hanson, Director

John Muir Project

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


See more