Lynn Wenzel: The heartbeats of women
Yes, indeed, Ms. McLaughlin, heartbeats should be heard — those of the millions of women across this country who also have a right to life, health, safety, legal protection — all those things you demand for unborn fetuses.
I lived through the pre-Roe v. Wade years. I sat with women weeping from botched, back-alley abortions who would never be able to give birth. I talked with women who cried because their birth control had failed — again — and who now had to figure out how to support another child on not-enough-money, but were told, “You’ll figure it out.”
And, I have known women who absolutely do not regret their decision to have a legal abortion at all — who felt only immense relief and the freedom that comes with being an adult human being.
I cannot let McLaughlin stack the deck against us one more time (The Union, Feb. 16). She ratchets up emotion and distorts facts to make it appear that callous women march blithely into a doctor or a hospital with a full-term baby in their body and say, “Kill it, I don’t care.” (By the way, a full-term ending of pregnancy is called childbirth, Ms. McLaughlin, not abortion.) She twists the truth to support an unsupportable thesis — that women are heartless beings who decide to get an abortion at the spur of the moment, or who decide that, after 40 weeks they “just don’t want to take this on.” She claims that the Reproductive Health Act recently passed in New York, which states that “a health care practitioner (such as a PA or NP who do not do surgical abortions, only pharmaceutical) … may perform an abortion” means that otherwise intelligent women with so much choice will be running “to their podiatrists” to end their pregnancies. C’mon.
It is true this bill ends the requirement that two doctors in addition to the woman’s own physician, must certify that a third-trimester abortion is necessary to prevent the woman’s death or mental impairment. Good. Women are not stupid. And neither are doctors. It is an insult to a woman’s private physician to say that he alone is neither fit nor capable of making a medical decision with his patient.
Next, McLaughlin asserts that those who support safe and legal abortion are practitioners of fetal infanticide. Really? How about the woman whose fetus has been medically adjudged to be able to live outside her body only 15 suffering minutes, or one agonizing day, so she decides to have it legally removed? Is she practicing infanticide? Should she be arrested and jailed? Predictably, McLaughlin brings up the one existing example of Dr. Kermit Gosnell who murdered babies after they were born and who is now serving a life prison term. As if he represents multitudes. There will always be evil among us. But to compare that heinous behavior with that of women using their legal right to terminate a pregnancy is equally heinous — and cruel.
The creation of legal framework for the idea that a fetus is a person, conceivably with more rights than the woman who carries it, has been the work of the anti-choice movement for over 47 years. Its drive to make abortion a deeply divisive emotional issue that could motivate evangelical voters and divide the electorate has resulted in rights being extended to clusters of cells and the erosion of the existing prerogative of an entire class — women. Women charged with pregnancy-related “crimes” are often poor, nonwhite, without resources or access to education, health care or decent job opportunities. Women with access to money could always find a way to terminate a pregnancy, even by traveling overseas. So it is that a class system is formed and then encoded into law. And there are also the many stories of women who, because they were black, and poor were railroaded into sterilization thereby losing rights to their individual freedom.
What I find “morally repugnant and repulsive” Ms. McLaughlin is the rhetoric that opposes women controlling their own health care while anti-choice voices increasingly support funding cuts in birth control availability and the social safety net. If you really care about human babies then you should be supporting freely available and affordable child care; you are, I hope, speaking out against the genocide of children in Yemen, warfare and poverty, supporting raising the minimum wage so women can feed their living children, and advocating universal health care for women and their families.
So many states are now enacting or have enacted fetal rights laws that Roe is being rendered moot. And if the Supreme Court ever rules that a fetus has “personhood” rights, all abortions would be illegal — even in states that strongly support a woman’s right to choose her own destiny. What happens to individual freedom then? If a woman becomes pregnant, does the state step in and take over her life, enforcing rules about what she can and cannot eat or drink, what medical decisions she can and cannot make, such as treating a cancer that might save her life but will kill her fetus? “Fetal personhood” might call into legal question birth control methods such as the pill, IUDs and the morning-after medication. And then we are all on the path to state-sanctioned forced pregnancy.
I have given birth during my long life and had a miscarriage. I am quite clear on what it means to raise a child and grieve a pregnancy. Women are not monsters. We have no desire to harm our babies or, unthinkingly, terminate a pregnancy; some of us remember with great sadness a pregnancy ended due to maternal health issues. We all live in our own realms of regrets and decisions made and not made.
But one thing I do know. If there is a fetus growing inside us it is us, not the state, with the authority to judge what is best for our health, our families and our futures. Any woman who values her freedom should think long and hard before ceding her body’s legitimacy to the dominion of government. Then, there will be no choice. It will be too late.
Lynn Wenzel lives in Grass Valley.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Nevada County is battling a fast-growing, hard-to-see and often-overlooked problem that threatens our youth: homelessness.