George Boardman: We will soon learn one consequence of electing Trump president | TheUnion.com
YOUR AD HERE »

George Boardman: We will soon learn one consequence of electing Trump president

George Boardman
George Boardman
Laura Mahaffy/lmahaffy@theunion.com | The Union

Observations from the center stripe: Judgment edition

JUDGING FROM the number of school-age children I see out and about during what used to be school hours, I’m guessing distance learning isn’t working out too well … JUDGING FROM the teenagers I’ve seen congregating, I’ve concluded they think social distancing doesn’t apply to them … ANYBODY WHO read “The Jungle” by Upton Sinclair in high school isn’t surprised by the blatant disregard for the safety of workers at meat processing plants … ANOTHER SHORTAGE: Fishing bait. People who like to fish have a lot more time to do it these days … WASTE MANAGEMENT reports it’s hauling a lot more residential garbage and a lot less industrial and commercial trash these days. Guess we know who will be in line for a rate increase … I DON’T know how restaurants can stay in business if they have to remove half their seats to meet social distancing guidelines …

Barack Obama observed that “elections have consequences,” and we will soon learn one of the consequences of electing Donald Trump president when the Supreme Court hands down decisions on several hot-button issues.

The court is expected to issue decisions before its summer break next month on cases involving abortion rights, immigration, gay rights, presidential power and religious freedom. Those decisions will be influenced by Trump’s two conservative appointees to the court — Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch.

Gorsuch replaced another conservative, Antonin Scalia, but Kavanaugh took the seat of Justice Anthony Kennedy, a long-time swing vote on the court who voted liberal too many times to suit conservatives. That appointment gives the court a shaky 5-4 conservative majority — some people think Chief Justice John Roberts is a budding Earl Warren in a conservative’s clothing.

Kavanaugh and Gorsuch are the most visible results of a Republican push to get as many conservatives in federal judicial positions as possible. At times, that appears to be the only agenda of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and there are reports that elderly conservative judges are being urged to retire so they can be replaced by younger ones who can serve 20 to 30 years on the federal bench.

We should get a good sense of the impact of Kavanaugh and Gorsuch between now and the end of June. How important are these decisions? “I have been teaching constitutional law for 40 years, and I cannot recall a Supreme Court term with more potential blockbuster cases in more areas of law,” said Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the U.C. — Berkeley law school.

The cases he’s referring to include the following:

Abortion rights: The court will rule on Medical Services LLC v. Gee, which challenges the constitutionality of a Louisiana law that requires doctors performing an abortion to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles.

The court struck down a similar Texas law in 2016, ruling the law did nothing to protect a woman’s health but did impact the availability of facilities where abortions are performed. But that was before Kavanaugh and Gorsuch joined the court, and conservatives see this case as an opportunity to further restrict the availability of abortions and perhaps even overrule Roe v. Wade.

Immigration: The court will rule on the legality of Obama’s executive order that accorded deferred deportation status to over 700,000 individuals known as “Dreamers,” individuals who were brought to the U.S. before the age of 16 and are either in school, have graduated, are in the military, or have been honorably discharged. The order, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), protects them from deportation for two years and lets them obtain work permits.

Gay, transgender rights: The court will decide on two cases where men were fired for being gay, and a third case where a woman was fired after informing her employer that she was transitioning from male to female.

The question before the court: Are these violations of the 1964 Civil Rights Act? The law makes no mention of sexual orientation but previous court decisions have expanded rights for gays and lesbians. All of those decisions were written by Kennedy.

Presidential power: The court will rule on three cases where lower courts upheld subpoenas concerning Trump’s financial records. Trump is asserting a broad immunity from investigation and legal process. The cases touch on the issue of checks and balances, and whether the president is effectively above the law.

Religious freedom: Montana’s legislature passed a law that gives tax credits to parents who send their children to private schools, both secular and religious, but the state’s Supreme Court ruled the law violates the state constitution’s prohibition against direct and indirect aid to religion.

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide if the state court decision violates the First Amendment’s guarantee of free exercise of religion. There is also the underlying issue of whether the government is required to give aid to religious institutions if it provides it to secular ones.

There’s no guarantee the court will render clear, unambiguous decisions in any of these cases. The court historically has — and will again — affirm or reject lower court rulings based on narrow grounds that dodge the main issue, and could even punt on an issue, as it did earlier this term in a case involving the transportation of legal firearms in New York state.

But I hope the court renders decisions that give voters a clear understanding of the consequence of their presidential vote in November. Given the age of two of the four liberal justices on the court, we will probably have a 7-2 conservative majority on the court in the next four years if Trump is reelected.

Voters need to decide if that’s the course they want the court to take.

Place your bets

People who like to bet legally on sports events have been left high and dry — and more solvent than they’ve been in a long time — since the coronavirus pandemic shut down the Nevada casinos and their bookmaking operations.

The only sports books currently operating are offshore, but they are illegal if you live in the United States and aren’t offering much in the way of action anyway. There is some horse racing taking place you can bet on. Otherwise, you’re confined to bets on future games that may never be played.

The Nevada casinos are likely to reopen before the professional leagues resume play, leaving the odds makers and ticket writers with little to do. Here’s a suggestion: Take a page from your European counterparts and offer proposition bets on non-sports activities.

The British sports books are famous for offering off-the-wall propositions tied to the events of the day, such as whether the latest pregnant royal will have a son or daughter, and what they might name the child. They also take bets on the outcome of our presidential elections, and that’s where the Nevada books can get in on the action.

This year’s presidential election figures to be hotly contested, and our rampant partisanship will generate strong opinions on both sides of the political divide that some people will want to back with wagers. That offers the opportunity for numerous proposition bets that can draw strong betting action.

That got me to thinking about what those propositions might be. Here are 11 from off the top of my head. I’m sure the pros can come up with a lot more. (Since I don’t run a bookmaking operation, the following is for amusement purposes only):

What will be Donald Trump’s losing margin in the popular vote: Over 2.9 million, under 2.9 million.

Will Trump dump Mike Pence from the ticket? Will, won’t.

If Trump dumps Pence from the ticket, who will be his vice presidential running mate: Jared Kushner, Ivanka, Steve Bannon, Stephen Miller, Alex Jones.

How many new women will come forward to claim Trump sexually assaulted them: Over three, under three.

If Trump loses a close election, will he: Leave office, refuse to leave office, send the troops into California to seize all of the illegal Joe Biden votes.

Biden has promised to select a woman as his running mate. Will it be: Michelle Obama, Maxine Waters, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, any other member of the Squad, Hillary Clinton, none of the above.

Tara Reade said she voted for Barack Obama twice. Will she also vote for Biden: Yes, no.

At some point during the campaign, Biden will forget where he is or forget his name: Forget location, forget name.

If Biden is elected president, his son Hunter will become a lobbyist for: Ukraine natural gas interests, a Chinese coronavirus tracking company, Unwed Mothers of America.

The newly formed Science Not Politics Party will sweep to victory behind a ticket of Andrew Cuomo and Gavin Newsom. Yes, no.

How long will it take to count the presidential vote in California: One week, one month, until the 12th of never.

George Boardman lives at Lake of the Pines. His column is published Mondays by The Union. Write to him at boredgeorgeman@gmail.com.


Support Local Journalism


Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.

For tax deductible donations, click here.
 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User