Cities push to keep control over cell phone infrastructure
Grass Valley and Nevada City are vocal opponents of what could soon become a new California law allowing cellular companies to install wireless infrastructure without approval from local governments.
Despite numerous city and county government leaders throughout the state opposing Senate Bill 649, the wireless telecommunications facilities bill, it has passed the state legislature and now awaits Governor Jerry Brown’s approval.
According to Grass Valley Council Member Jan Arbuckle, over 300 of California’s 482 cities have written letters to state leaders opposing the bill.
Arbuckle was recently elected second vice president of the League of California Cities and attended a press conference last week hosted by the league discussing SB-649.
“It is such a bad bill for communities,” she said.
Arbuckle said the proposed law could pose challenges to maintaining Grass Valley’s historic aesthetic.
“You can have this big, ugly, refrigerator-size box put down right in the middle of Mill Street on a pole,” she said. “That’s just not okay.”
Nevada City Council Member Reinette Senum called the proposed law — known informally as the “small cells bill” — a “hostile takeover by the telecom industry of local authority.”
As a direct result of the city’s activism, Senum said, the bill was amended to exempt historic districts from giving up the right to regulate wireless infrastructure.
If the new law passes, local governments will be unable to regulate the installation of cellular facilities on locally owned utility poles, streetlights and other suitable host infrastructure located within the public right-of-way and will also be unable to profit off of the infrastructure.
At its Tuesday night meeting, the Grass Valley City Council members voted to send a letter to Brown requesting he veto SB-649.
“By eliminating our local discretion and mandating a ministerial process, SB 649 effectively eliminates the ability for our residents and businesses from having fair input over the character of their own communities,” the letter states.
“Most troubling is the shift of authority from the community and our elected officials to for-profit corporations for wireless equipment installations that can have significant health, safety, and aesthetic impacts when those companies have little, if any, interest to respect these concerns that potentially conflict with their profit margins.”
Grass Valley City Manager Tim Kiser said city staff and council members have been following the bill’s status for months and previously submitted a letter of opposition to state lawmakers.
SB-649 was presented to Brown Sept. 21. He is expected to sign or veto the bill within 30 days of presentation.
To contact Staff Writer Matthew Pera, email firstname.lastname@example.org or call 530-477-4231.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User