Abusive language? | TheUnion.com

Abusive language?

I remember being puzzled by the aftermath to your last proclamation of letter rules. Then, as now, you require letter writers to avoid “personal attacks or foul, abusive or threatening language.” What part of “liar” or “village idiot,” et al, applied to the president or anyone else, is not foul or abusive language?

I would expect you to be equally censorial, for instance, were someone on the other side of the political divide to call John Kerry a traitor based on his congressional testimony following the Vietnam war. Of course, this is less likely to happen with as great frequency; such folks seem to pay more attention to actual facts, and to be more restrained in their ad hominem pejoratives than the Bush haters.

Ed Beckenbach

North San Juan

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Grass Valley and Nevada County make The Union’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User